Thursday, June 30, 2011

Traveling in the Past

Alice B. Toklas once said something like: "I don't travel anymore ... except in the past."  That's what I'll do today, inspired by someone's sending me a picture of Rudolf Nureyev's grave.


It was 1999. Mark and I went to St. Maartens. I got crushes on four different Jamaican girls who worked at various jobs on the island. There was Dorothy, and there was Ruth, and then there was Albertha. Not Alberta -- Albertha.  Later in the week there was Princess Ferron. First name, middle name. I forget what Princess Ferron's last name was. Or maybe I didn't ask. I just said, "Princess .. what a beautiful name!"


Princess Ferron seemed to like my name quite as much as I liked hers.  It is her father's name too. "George is a very strong name," she said.


She liked Mark's name as well. "From the gospels! Are you gentle?" she asked Mark, and then, turning to me, asked, "Is he gentle?"


"Yes," I said, and then, recalling a few incidents of a swiftly risen temper within Mark, said, "Well .. not always!"  Princess Ferron rewarded me with a beautiful dark-skinned white-toothed musical laughter.


I was always swooning listening to the lovely lilting English of these Jamaican girls.  It was music.  I thought that I should perhaps go to Jamaica and hear it all the time all around me, but when I asked Princess why she was on St. Maartens instead of at home in Jamaica she said, "Because it is so quiet here and you don't hear shots ring out in the night."
*
We sailed across the blue sea for an hour and three-quarters on a catamaran to the island of Saint Barthélemy. Eighty degrees. Hot sun.

We buy a van tour of the island. Ten bucks.

On a high cliff on the western tip of the island is a wonderfully cozy house snuggled close to the edge of a cliff that descends sheerly to the sea.  The house is close to the road and the view from it is magnificent. Its situation between the road and the sea intensifies its cozy esthetic. I long to move into it. The driver slows down a bit. "This house," he announces, "belonged to Rudolph Nureyev, you know, the dancer." My insides start jumping around. I stare at the house for as long as possible. Carved into the wooden gate, in a lovely script, and in idiosyncratic spelling, I read: Roody Nooreyev.

Looking back I see there is a quote carved into a wall of the house. It's in French. I call out to the driver, "Can you translate what that says on the house?" He is busy chatting with the attractive woman he's placed next to him up front. "No, I can't," he lies.

I want to yell, "Why the fuck not?" because the woman next to him is French; she and the driver have been chatting away in French since the tour began.

It's just the way I am but I felt it was imperative that I know what the great dancer had had inscribed on his house. I felt cheated. I didn't want to be, as I was, just a tourist driving past, but rather to have time reversed and to be with Nureyev in that house, to gaze with him at the stupendous view. I recall those news items from those sixties jet-set days and who Rudy's pals were. I wondered if Princess Margaret had come to party in this house. Margot Fonteyn? Me?

No. And today Rudy is six years dead and I am in a rickety van on a bumpy road on a tiny Caribbean island, and I am without the chutzpah to demand that the van be stopped and I be let out so that I can copy the quote for myself and have my brother translate it for me later.

We are, after all, a van load of international tourists. For a novelist, we probably could be the framework of a mini-version of Porter's Ship of Fools. None of us can be in that big of a rush. It occurs to me anyhow that I haven't even brought a pen or pencil. The van picks up speed. The house disappears when we round a curve.


[By now of course, twelve years later, Google has been devised. It takes me seconds to pull up a picture of that house and read: Je ne suis pas fait pour vivre en societe: c'est artificiel. It takes me another few seconds for Babelfish to translate: "I am not made to live in society: it is artificial."]
*
After the tour ends we walk into the little town. We eat at a restaurant Jimmy Buffet opened here, the legend being that because when he'd initially docked at the island he was irritated because there was no place to buy a cheeseburger. Another patron informed us that Buffet "wrote a song about it."

Could be a good song but the cheeseburgers we were served were lousy. Dumb tourists we are. We walk around the town afterwards and run across three or four other places that all look perfectly inviting and non-tourist-trappy. We go in an adorable little place that serves coffee and ice cream. While we're waiting for our treats a couple who had sailed over on the catamaran with us comes in. We see there are no free tables so gesture that they may sit with us.

They are Germans. She looks perhaps 30, he perhaps 40. I had spoken to the man on the boat; our bit of conversation had been about the recent move of the Federal Government from Bonn to Berlin. "Much money," the German had said. "Did they move into old buildings?" I asked. "No! Much new! Much money!" "Probably about as much as my government is spending in trying to impeach our president," I said.

Now in the sweet cafe the man sits next to Mark. His woman sits next to me. They are absolutely warm and lovely and speak pretty good English. Introductions are made. I didn't catch the man's name so I imagine him as Wolfgang. I think all German males should be named Wolfgang. His girlfriend's name is Dagmar. I had noticed on the boat that she was pretty. Now as she turns her face to me I am stunned; I see that she is not simply pretty but totally drop-dead gorgeous, refulgent, luminous, one of the most perfectly-featured women I've ever laid eyes on. One hundred percent Aryan-looking. Blonde hair; blue eyes. He too is good looking, blond, blue-eyed. Hitler would so have admired their looks.

President Clinton is brought up again -- all foreigners, I assume, are appalled that a public man's private life is grist for the mill of character assassination. To ignore another's private peccadillos is part of sophistication

We learn that this couple has been living three months on his sailboat, which he keeps at St. Thomas.

When Wolfgang says what town they are from and mentions upon what sea he learned to sail, I immediately grab the slight opening to introduce literature into the conversation. "Oh," I chime, "that's where Thomas Mann grew up!"

They looked at one another. "Sometimes .. yes," Wolfgang says hesitatingly.

Wolfgang is absolutely correct with his 'sometimes' -- the Mann family spent summers there. Wolf & Dag do not seem comfortable with the mention of Thomas Mann. Is he recalled as a traitor? Not taught in der schulen? He did abandon Germany and was then to pronounce judgments about the German character that were not flattering, and for which he was publicly chastised by even his brother, also a novelist, though nowhere near a novelist of the stature of Thomas Mann.

And, too, Thomas Mann had a streak of perversion; as an old man he had stared at a young boy on the beach off Venice and then wrote a novella about it, a novella which so masterfully portrays a certain type of longing that Death in Venice will be read as long as books are read. The story seems too authentic to be anything but what the author himself experienced. Is it for this presumed perversion that half those sitting at our table seem uncomfortable with his name?

And, too, after all, Mann's wife was Jewish. I am curious now to know if Mann is on any syllabus in all of das Vaterland.
*
Our companions are, if not enthusiastic to speak about Mann, comfortable in speaking about Hermann Hesse. "I loved Steppenwolf!" I say. They both loved Siddartha but the one Hesse book that they really love and which they urge that I must read is .. what? .. they don't know how to say it in English.

We work at it and work at it, but I cannot understand. Exasperation is approaching when finally Dagmar reaches into her bag for pen and paper and writes Narziss und Goldmund.

"Oh, Narcissus and Goldmund!" I exclaim happily as if we have at last solved the puzzle of the origin of the universe. I try to show that I am clever by explaining in mime that, yes, Narcissus was a Greek god who .. yes .. I wave my hands in circles over the table, saying "this is a lake" and I bend over and peer into this lake, but apparently only I am imagining the lake for Wolfgang and Dagmar are peering at me as if I have gone off some deep end.

But it has been such a pleasant lunch all in all and I am feeling such liebe for our companions; I promise to read Narcissus and Goldmund. Then I remember that I have also read Hesse's great masterpiece called variously Glockenspiel or The Glass Bead Game. It is a beautiful story, complicated but beautifully written, and I can't get the title across to the Germans. I write Glockenspiel on Dagmar's paper but they seem not be be familiar with it. They enthuse again about Siddartha. In trying to praise The Glass Bead Game I demonstrate with my fingers that Siddartha is only this thick" while The Glass Bead Game is a good two inches thick -- as if greatness is measured by breadth!
*
And so, yes, all this comes back because my cyberspace friend sent me a picture of Rudolf Nureyev's grave -- thanks, Joan -- and it struck me as the most spectacular of spectacular markers, and prompted me to recall passing by his home on St. Bart's:

On the website it says "This mosaic memorial resembles
one of the oriental kilim rugs that Nureyev  loved so much."

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Beautiful Sculpturing in Australia

Detail from marker in Point Frederick Cemetery; New South Wales; Australia



Thanks Joan, my cemetery-loving soul-mate, for this picture.  I love it. 

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Samuel Beckett's Graveyard-Loving Character


Dublin-born Samuel Beckett
In a Samuel Beckett short story called "First Love" the narrator speaks of what attracts him to graveyards: The smell of the corpses, distinctly perceptible under those of grass and humus mingled, I do not find unpleasant, a trifle on the sweet side perhaps, a trifle heady, but how infinitely preferable to what the living emit ... And when my father's remains join in, however modestly, I can almost shed a tear. The living wash in vain, in vain perfume themselves, they stink. Yes, as a place for an outing, when out I must, leave me my graveyards and keep -- you -- to your public parks and beauty spots. My sandwich, my banana, tastes sweeter when I'm sitting on a tomb, and when the time comes to piss again, as it so often does, I have my pick.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Happy Birthday to Joyce Carol Oates, born on this day in 1938

I've read only four or five of her novels. (A witty friend of mine back in the late sixties said "you could read her first book and you will have read them all.") I'm more fascinated by her than I am by her fiction.  The writer astonishes! She's published some eighty works of fiction. Eight plays. Up to twenty books of essays and memoirs. Ten books of poetry.


President presents Oates with National
Humanities Medal, March 3, 2011
As for her fiction, she seems to take on other and different characters, and relates to these characters as people who borrow her body, so to speak, and take over her mind. Further, when she sits down for an interview she may assume herself to be the character who "wrote" one or another of her novels; thus, in all the interviews she's given, none was necessarily with the authentic Joyce Carol Oates!


"What is the compulsion to disguise oneself?" she asks of herself in her journal. "Perhaps it is true, as Jung says or seems to say, that the establishing of a 'mask' is a built-in instinct in man, an archetype. Not one mask but many. Therefore it is not hypocritical but wise, natural, and valuable -- and moral -- to create a persona for various contexts. Certainly my own experience leads me to confirm this hypothesis.  It is the presentation of an utterly frank, open, trusting, naive, genuine self that strikes me as being in a way perverse and hypocritical .... The value, then, of knowing a number of people who are substantially different from oneself and from one another: in each context one is forced to create a different persona.


There was a rumor in 1993 that the next Nobel Prize for Literature was going to be awarded to an American female. Gambling and guessing, Playboy quickly arranged an interview with Joyce Carol Oates; it would come out in the month the prize winner was announced.


That year's prize went to Toni Morrison!


Playboy lost. I won, though. I loved the typically excellent and in-depth interview that Playboy is famous for. In this one, which struck me as an interview with the authentic author, JCO bemoaned what she called her need to write -- she said it was a compulsion, not a pleasure. She said that she often wishes that she did not have to write but that she cannot stop herself. It actually made me feel sort of sorry for her.  I had noticed that there seemed to be, in photographs of her, a tinge of some sort of genius in her strikingly beautiful eyes.  Earlier I might have used 'madness' in the previous sentence in place of 'genius'.


Ms. Oates does not consider herself insane. "Also yesterday, at the end of an hour's generally congenial and rewarding interview, with Bill Richardson of the Miami Herald Bill asked me to respond to the fact that virtually everyone he knew in Miami believed I was insane.  I asked him to repeat the statement; stared, blinked; must have looked uncommonly baffled, and murmured something about that being rather ... well, rather ... odd, surely? ... since I have been teaching at universities since 1961 ... and have published so many books ... and ... well ... surely ... 'It's like being asked if you're syphilitic,' I said, feeling both hurt and angered, or what you think about the 'fact' that people imagine you're cross-eyed ...."  Bill apologized at once; wondered if he'd actually phrased the statement correctly; people wanted to know, it seems, whether I was sane."


So while it was a shock to her to think that anyone might think her insane, it was, as she discloses later in the journals, a "dim shock" for her to realize "that others think of me as 'successful.'"


Writing over a hundred books is not success?


Here's one of my favorite anecdotes about Joyce Carol Oates. Her friend, Alicia Ostricker, a poet, said to her, "I can't imagine what it's like to be you." Ms. Oates replied, "I can't either."


I was thrilled when, in 2007, The Journals of Joyce Carol Oates 1973-1982 was published. Frankly, I'd rather read about authors than read most of the fiction they produce. This book of over-500-pages was made up of excerpts from 4000-some pages of the single-spaced typewritten original! Good lord! She'd written all those books and had, additionally, kept a massive journal!


Some books you really do hate to have to put down -- you have to go to work, or you have to go to sleep -- and this was certainly one that I could hardly put down even while I lament that the quicker you finish a compelling book the quicker your pleasure will have come to an end.


She was a friend and correspondent of Anne Sexton, one of my favorite poets.  I loved JCO's kind thoughts about suicides written after Sexton, in 1974, drove her car into her garage, went into the house to don her mother's mink coat, returned to her garage, shut the door, shut the car's windows, started the engine, and waited for death: "For a suicidal person like Anne Sexton to have survived to the age of forty-five seems to me an achievement, a triumph," wrote JCO. "Virginia Woolf, living to the age of fifty-nine, is even more extraordinary. Suicides are always judged as if they were admissions of defeat, but one can take the viewpoint that their hving lived as long as they did is an accomplishment of a kind. Knowing herself suicidal as a very young girl, Virginia Woolf resisted -- made heroic attempts to attach herself to the exterior world -- as did Anne Sexton -- as do we all. Why not concentrate on the successes, the small and large joys of these lives, the genuine artistic accomplishments? After all, anyone and everyone dies; the exact way can't be very important ... society is the picnic certain individuals leave early, the party they fail to enjoy, the musical comedy they find not worth the price of admission."


At another point, she writes: "Unless Virginia Woolf weighed a certain amount, she said, she would see visions and hear voices. Which suggests the powerful link between 'madness' and one's chemical equilibrium; and perhaps the link between fasting and the visions of the saints ... fasting and meditation certainly bring about an alteration of consciousness."


A madonna-like Ms. Oates
There is in the journals an unusual take on the character of Jesus: "Studying St. Matthew," she writes. "[Am] rather discouraged by the fundamental silliness of the Christ story: Christ's intolerance (threatening people with hell who merely don't listen to his disciples), his predeliction for flattery (it's because Peter says 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God' that Peter is given the keys to the kingdom of heaven), his ruthless sense of his own righeousness ('He that is not with me is against me.'), his childlike insistence upon the identity of wish and action ('Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath comitted adultery with her already in his heart' -- etc. -- a psychologically invalid theory, to say the least), his general obnoxious zeal, his intemperance re: giving advice ('Take therefore no thought for the morrow ...') that will only cause trouble for others. Again and again whole cities are threatened with destruction, with being 'brought down to hell.'  The tenderness, the faith-hope-charity, etc., forgiveness of enemies, are really quite subordinate to this dictatorial person, who says at one point that he comes not to destroy but to fulfill, and then says, at another, that he brings not peace but a sword: 'For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother ...' Such is Christ's unchristliness that one is forced to interpret everything as symbolic, as pointing toward meanings other than the literal.  But it seems clear that he really wished his 'enemies' (those who don't care to follow him) in hell, where they would suffer terribly; he lusted after complete dominion over men's minds."


So, after calling him childish, self-righteous, obnoxious, dictatorial, and schizophrenic, Ms. Oates concludes that "Christ isn't very different from any inspired hypermaniacal bully ...."


"All this is distasteful, and disappointing," she reflects. "It wasn't my intention -- it never has been -- to ridicule beliefs that others take seriously. So long as anyone believes anything, that belief should be respected."


Six months later, returning to Bible reading, she writes, "The Bible as poetry is haunting, and heartbreakingly beautiful. The Bible as a guide for moral conduct, or (god save us!) as history: almost worthless. For it's jumbled, scrambled, rather demented, a cacophony. When I finish this novel [in which she was attempting to base a character on the Devil] I doubt that I'll even glance at [the Bible] again for many many years."


Ms. Oates seems removed from politics.  She wouldn't have gone around spouting, as I did, if only in my  mind, "Yes We Can" during the last Presidential campaign. You'll come across her almost single political musings in the journals on page 240: "Where more than a few people are gathered together the seed of corruption, or selfishness, always flowers ... I don't know why -- haven't any idea. But egotism asserts itself, inevitably, in any relationship that isn't tempered by mutual regard and affection."
***
With husband, Raymond Smith
One thing that struck me as I read the journals was how seemingly perfect was her marriage to a man named Raymond Smith. They admired one another, cared for one another, and it occurred to me that possibly she couldn't live without him, so it was a shock in late February of 2008 when I read in The New York Times that "Raymond J. Smith, a founder and the longtime editor of The Ontario Review, a noted literary Journal, died on Feb. 18 in Princeton, N.J. He was 77 and lived in Princeton. The cause was complications of pneumonia .... With his wife, the novelist Joyce Carol Oates, Mr. Smith founded The Ontario Review in 1974.  Until his death, he was its editor; Ms. Oates was the associate editor.  The journal, which appears twice yearly, has published the work of established writers -- including Margaret Atwood, Donald Barthelme, Saul Bellow, Raymond Carver, Nadine Gordimer, Ted Hughes, Doris Lessing, Philip Roth, John Updike and Robert Penn Warren -- as well as that of young writers.  Raymond Joseph Smith was born in Milwaukee on March 12, 1930. He earned a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, followed by a Ph.D. in English from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in 1960. He later taught at the University of Windsor in Ontario and at New York University before becoming a full-time editor and publisher. In addition to Ms. Oates, whom he married in 1961, Mr. Smith is survived by a sister, Mary."

In February of this year Joyce Carol Oates published A Widow's Story, an account of her husband's death and the approximately six to eight months following it, a period of despair, grief, nightmares, insomnia ... on and on ... and the idea of suicide came often to the widow's mind. "Do not think," she writes, "if you are healthy-minded, and the thought of suicide is abhorrent to you ... that suicide is, for others, a negative thought -- not at all. Suicide's in fact a consoling thought. Suicide is the secret door by which you can exit the world at any time -- it's wholly up to you."

Elsewhere in the memoir:  "It's a sad comfort -- far more sad than comforting -- to know that one's books are being translated, sold, and presumably read in many countries, even as one's life lies in tatters; and what a mocking sort of 'good news' it is to be informed, via email, on the eve of Ray's birthday last week, that a long-anticipated exhibit of a collection of my books owned by the writer/interviewer Larry Grobel in Los Angeles has just been mounted in the Powell Library at UCLA under the title JOYCE CAROL OATES - THE WONDER WOMAN OF AMERICAN LITERATURE."

"Though the rest of my life is in ruins ... I am determined not to be an addict," she writes as she comes perilously close to addiction to this or that pain and/or sleeping pill .... I have come to feel enormous sympathy for drug addicts of all kinds, as for alcoholics, the walking wounded who surround us .... Their spiritual malaise is such, only powerful medication can assuage it.  Otherwise, there is suicide .... What astonishes me is that there are so many who don't succumb. So many people who have not killed themselves."

With Charles Gross in Stockholm
No sooner had one finished this harrowing account of widowhood than one learned that Joyce Carol Oates had, eleven months after her beloved husband's death, become happily engaged to a professor of neuroscience, whom she has since married.


For not having mentioned this new love in A Widow's Story, she was lacerated -- most notably and most visciously by Janet Maslin, the nasty book reviewer for The New York Times.  

Please!  Miss Oates no doubt had the book written in her mind, if not on her word processor, before she met her second husband; and had every right -- every right -- to complete it as planned.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Breaking Haiku Rules

When I set out to write 14 haiku about hiking with my dog in the woods I aimed to practice the classical form of "three lines containing 5, 7, and 5 syllables respectively". It was fun, word-puzzle-like fun, but taking too much time. So I threw formalism away; my task was done in no time. A few weeks later I came across wonderful justification for what I'd done in Beautiful & Pointless: A Guide to Modern Poetry by David Orr, who is a poetry columnist for The New York Times Book Review. 


     ... here is former poet laureate Robert
     Hass translating one of Kohayashi Issa's
     haiku:
          
               Don't worry, spiders,
          I keep house
               casually


          It's not even close to 5-7-5! But it's
     lovely, and it sure seems like a haiku, 
     doesn't it?  The question, then, is if we
     should reject what is probably our initial
     notion -- This is a haiku -- because of the
     failure of the poem to adhere to the syllable
     count we've been told is necessary. On one 
     hand, 5-7-5 seems like a clear standard that
     plainly hasn't been met. On the other hand,
     again, Hass's poem certainly looks like a
     haiku -- and since an English syllable isn't
     actually the equivalent of the sound unit
     used to compose Japanese haiku, the 5-7-5
     count can be no better than an approximation
     of the original version (on top of that, the
     haiku is one vertical line in Japanese, not
     three horizontal lines).  So because the
     haiku is a relatively young form taken from
     another culture, it seems reasonable to 
     assume its "rules," if that's what they are,
     can still be contested.


So, yes, in composing my haiku I threw away formalism thinking that since the haiku is a relatively young form taken from another culture, it was a reasonable thing to do.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

What Dogs Might Know

I know my dog loves me .. I'm sure my dog loves me .. but I like the idea in this poem that sometimes we humans must seem sickening to dogs, and we may not know them as well as we think we do.


The Revenant - Billy Collins

I am the dog you put to sleep,
as you like to call the needle of oblivion,
come back to tell you this simple thing:
I never liked you--not one bit.
When I licked your face,
I thought of biting off your nose.
When I watched you toweling yourself dry,
I wanted to leap and unman you with a snap.
I resented the way you moved,
your lack of animal grace,
the way you would sit in a chair to eat,
a napkin on your lap, knife in your hand.
I would have run away,
but I was too weak, a trick you taught me
while I was learning to sit and heel,
and--greatest of insults--shake hands without a hand.
I admit the sight of the leash
would excite me
but only because it meant I was about
to smell things you had never touched.
You do not want to believe this,
but I have no reason to lie.
I hated the car, the rubber toys,
disliked your friends and, worse, your relatives.
The jingling of my tags drove me mad.
You always scratched me in the wrong place.
All I ever wanted from you
was food and fresh water in my metal bowls.
While you slept, I watched you breathe
as the moon rose in the sky.
It took all of my strength
not to raise my head and howl.
Now I am free of the collar,
the yellow raincoat, monogrammed sweater,
the absurdity of your lawn,
and that is all you need to know about this place
except what you already supposed
and are glad it did not happen sooner--
that everyone here can read and write,
the dogs in poetry, the cats and the others in prose.

Monday, June 6, 2011

Normandy


Last year my brother and I took a four hour tour along the Normandy coast where the D-Day operations and battles took place; it was awesome; amazingly moving; for the most part you are just speechless as you learn at such close-hand of the intricate planning involved, of the bravery, and of the horrors that took place along that beautiful coast.  

Saturday, June 4, 2011

Hiking Haiku

Fourteen Hiking Haiku

for Joan Kunze

Step into Wellfleet woods
unleash dog
freedom



Life's simple today
blue jeans t-shirt leather boots
warm sun



Hiking within
e e cummings' leafy
green spirits



As fourteen white fluffs
punctuate his true
blue sky



Butterfly careens, dashes
darts, flutters, mindless of
meter

Mushrooms, born overnight,
fully formed, festoon path
honoring Plath



Residue of bonfire 
in clearing; strewn empty
containers





Come upon calm clear pure
Spectacle Pond
Narcissus



Kerouac's juju beads in mind
his knees cold
mine creaky





Maelstrom of earthly scents
scintillated dog
dead vole



Breathe in, yoga man,
'72 hitch-hiker recalled,
breathe out





Counting syllables
measuring meter
seeking rhyme



Aimless steps
going anyhere
no sense of time




Toward dusk, homeward bound,
reflecting: Lou Reed:
perfect day


   

Friday, June 3, 2011

Another Jane Kenyon poem ...

Someone I like has said more than once that she usually doesn't enjoy reading poetry. And then, on May 23, I observed Jane Kenyon's birthday by using her poem "Let Evening Come" in a post. Later that someone who'd said she usually didn't enjoy poetry said she had really liked "Let Evening Come". I really liked it that she really liked it. This got me to thinking how beautiful but also how accessible .. how user friendly .. Jane Kenyon's poems are, and how this achievement of simplicity is an art in itself, and Kenyon was especially adept at it. And so here's another Kenyon poem, typed out for Lisa.(I think this poem has a touch of Anne Sexton to it, but I can't quite pick it out without going back to Sexton's poems; I can't spare the time to do that; otherwise I would.)




               OTHERWISE


               I got out of bed
               on two strong legs.
               It might have been
               otherwise. I ate
               cereal, sweet
               milk, ripe, flawless
               peach. It might
               have been otherwise.
               I took the dog uphill
               to the birch wood.
               All morning I did
               the work I love.
               At noon I lay down
               with my mate. It might
               have been otherwise.
               We ate dinner together
               at a table with silver
               candlesticks. It might
               have been otherwise.
               I slept in a bed
               in a room with paintings
               on the walls, and
               planned another day
               just like this day.
               But one day, I know,
               it will be otherwise.
               

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Happy Birthday to My Friend Jim Rann

Jim Rann, circa 1970, sitting in Dennis Little's apartment; 105 North Pennsylvania Ave.; Lansing, Michigan. 

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Happy Birthday to Marilyn Monroe (RIP) - 6/1/26 - 8/5/62


A real person who lived the life of flesh and blood but also existed in millions and millions ... and by now billions I suppose ... of dreams.  I was working in the Western Union Telegraph office in Alpena, Michigan, on a Sunday morning, when the ticker tape transmitted the news of her death.  Some twenty years later my friends Drew and Will gave me the above piece of art Drew had done, nicely matted and framed.  I loved Marilyn Monroe.  I loved the idea of her.  I love this depiction of her.